|
The Royal Mail Case or ''R v Kylsant & Otrs'' was a noted English criminal case in 1931. The director of the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company, Lord Kylsant, had falsified a trading prospectus with the aid of the company accountant to make it look as if the company was profitable and to entice potential investors. Following an independent audit instigated by HM Treasury, Kylsant and John Moreland, the company auditor, were arrested and charged with falsifying both the trading prospectus and company records and accounts. Although they were acquitted of falsifying records and accounts, Kylsant was found guilty of falsifying the trading prospectus and sentenced to twelve months in prison. The company was then liquidated, and reconstituted as The Royal Mail Lines Ltd with the backing of the British government. As well as its immediate impact, the case instigated massive changes in the way companies were audited. The case highlighted flaws in the way company accounts were reviewed, and "probably had a greater impact on the quality of published data than all the Companies Acts passed up to that date".〔Camfferman (1998) p.4〕 The case "fell like an atomic bomb and profoundly disturbed both the industrial and the accountancy worlds",〔 and has also been linked to reduced public trust of big businesses. The case is also seen as the reason for the demise of accounting with the aid of secret reserves.〔 ==Background== The Royal Mail Steam Packet Company was a British shipping company founded in London in 1839 by James MacQueen. It became the largest shipping group in the world when it took over the White Star Line in 1927.〔(Shipping Lines: Royal Mail Steam Packet Company )〕 Lord Kylsant had been chairman of the company since 1902. He had expanded the company rapidly: aside from the White Star Line, he bought the Pacific Steam Navigation Company in 1910 for £1.5 million,〔£1,500,000 in 1910 would be worth approximately £ in .〕 the Union-Castle Line in 1912, and assumed control of the Harland and Wolff shipyards in 1924.〔Hyde (1960) p.220〕 The company had prospered during the First World War as the government paid to requisition its ships as military supply vessels and troop transports. The company had saved the profits, predicting that it would need them to cover income tax and excess profits tax. After these taxes had been paid there was approximately £1 million left,〔£1,000,000 in 1919 would be worth approximately £ in .〕 which they again saved, hoping to use this to cover any financial difficulties that might arise. The reserves were again boosted with government money paid under the Trade Facilities Act 1921,〔Stacey (1980) p.150〕 but between 1921 and 1925 the profits of the company rapidly dropped and, beginning from 1926, the directors supplemented the company income by taking money from the reserves.〔Hyde (1960) p.221〕 In 1929 the company asked HM Treasury for an extension of the period in which government loans to the company could be paid. The Treasury first demanded an audit of the company accounts, and sent Sir William McClintock to write a report on the financial state of the company. McClintock's report revealed that the company had not earned any trading profits since 1925, but was still paying dividends by taking money from the reserves. The company had reported £439,000 profits for 1926,〔£439,000 in 1926 would be worth approximately £ in .〕 but had drawn £750,000〔£750,000 in 1926 would be worth approximately £ in .〕 out of the reserves and falsified accounts to make it appear that the money came from trading.〔 In 1927 the company made a trading loss of £507,000,〔£507,000 in 1927 would be worth approximately £ in .〕 but money was again drawn from the reserves to make it appear that the company had made a profit of £478,000.〔£478,000 in 1927 would be worth approximately £ in .〕〔Green (1982) p.72〕 As a result of this, and a report that in 1928 the company had issued a fraudulent prospectus inviting customers to buy shares in the company and saying that it had earned an average £500,000 a year in the last decade, arrest warrants were issued for Lord Kylsant and John Moreland, the company auditor.〔 At the time the ruse was discovered the company had a trading deficit of £300,000 a year,〔£300,000 in 1929 would be worth approximately £ in .〕〔Edwards (1989) p.151〕 the reserves were completely exhausted, and the company owed £10 million.〔£10,000,000 in 1929 would be worth approximately £ in .〕〔Green (1982) p.93〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Royal Mail Case」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|